![]() Therefore, if there is only one final end, this will be what we are seeking, and if there are more than one, the most final of these will be what we are seeking. ![]() wealth, flutes, and in general instruments) for the sake of something else, clearly not all ends are final ends but the chief good is evidently something final. Since there are evidently more than one end, and we choose some of these (e.g. So the argument has by a different course reached the same point but we must try to state this even more clearly. Therefore, if there is an end for all that we do, this will be the good achievable by action, and if there are more than one, these will be the goods achievable by action. In medicine this is health, in strategy victory, in architecture a house, in any other sphere something else, and in every action and pursuit the end for it is for the sake of this that all men do whatever else they do. What then is the good of each? Surely that for whose sake everything else is done. ![]() It seems different in different actions and arts it is different in medicine, in strategy, and in the other arts likewise. Let us again return to the good we are seeking, and ask what it can be. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |